Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. $50,000.00 in Seized Funds from JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 1:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$50,000.00 in Seized Funds from JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA and $50,000 in Seized Funds from JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 098
United States of America v. $105,719.63 in Funds from Account Held in the Name of Commercial Buying Equities LLC at JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 3:2021cv00004
Defendant:
$105,719.63 in Funds from Account Held in the Name of Commercial Buying Equities LLC at JP Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. $44,419.64 in Funds Seized from an Account Held in the Name of Joseph Estates LLC at JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 3:2021cv00022
Defendant:
$44,419.64 in Funds Seized from an Account Held in the Name of Joseph Estates LLC at JP Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Monson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 4:2012cv00616
Plaintiff:
Jay Alan Monson and Elite Commerce, LLC
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Staib v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 3:2010cv00157
Plaintiff:
Barbara L. Staib
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, ING Direct, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Paleichuck v JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 1:2009cv00167
Plaintiff:
Sergei Paleichuk
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Allbee et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2008cv03013
Plaintiff:
Richard A Allbee, Richard A Allbee, Christine M Sampson and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
