Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wieland et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 4:2014cv00695
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Wieland and Kristina M. Wieland
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyle v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 4:2013cv00454
Plaintiff:
Julia L. Boyle
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association , JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and American Homes 4 Rent, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Zwartynski et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 4:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Zwartynski and Maritta Zwartynski
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ridout et al v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00575
Plaintiff:
Marc Ridout and Amanda Whitsell Ridout
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
1011 Monticello Family Trust Successor to Marina Medellin & Michael Medellin v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 4:2012cv00321
Plaintiff:
1011 Monticello Family Trust Successor to Marina Medellin & Michael Medellin
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tizon et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association et al
as 4:2012cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jose Tizon and Maria Cordero
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association and Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation National Lenders Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dobbs et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 2:2011cv00321
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Dobbs and Lizbeth Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
