Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
GARCIA v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2023cv04244
Plaintiff:
JUAN F. GARCIA
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and PAYPAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ESPINOZA GARCIA et al v. OPERADORA DE MARINAS, S.A. DE C.V et al
as 3:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
JUAN ESPINOZA GARCIA, ALBA NOVOA and KAREMM BURBANK
Defendant:
OPERADORA DE MARINAS, S.A. DE C.V., BAHIA MAYA MARINA, S.A. DE C.V., OPERADORA NEW LIFE, S.A. DE C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BONILLA v. RASIER LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02048
Plaintiff:
GERMANIA THALIA BONILLA
Defendant:
RASIER LLC, JUAN LUIS GARCIA, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
BONILLA v. GARCIA et al
as 2:2022cv02048
Plaintiff:
GERMANIA THALIA BONILLA
Defendant:
RASIER LLC, JUAN LUIS GARCIA, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Jose Albertorio-GarciaIn re: Jose Albertorio-Garcia
as 21-2854
Petitioner:
In re: JOSE JUAN ALBERTORIO-GARCIA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jose Albertorio-Garcia
as 21-1494
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE JUAN ALBERTORIO-GARCIA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Albertorio-Garcia v. USA
as 1:2018cv00792
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Juan Albertorio-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Jose Albertorio-Garcia
as 16-3257
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE JUAN ALBERTORIO-GARCIA, a/k/a Jose Garcia, a/k/a P-Juan, a/k/a Matatan
In re: Juan Garcia-Villa
as 15-3348
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: JUAN ANTONIO GARCIA-VILLA, a/k/a Tony
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
J. CURTIS JOYNER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
