Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Georkeshia Campbell, et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICES, et al
as 12-55725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORKESHIA DENISE CAMPBELL and KATHLEEN ESTES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICES, CEO OF BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATE, BAC HOME LOAN DIVISION, & its employee, shareholders, investors and others
Georkeshia Denise Campbell et al v. United States Postal Services et al
as 2:2011cv10741
Defendant:
AT and T, Tamala Alexander, American Express and others
Plaintiff:
Georkeshia Denise Campbell and Kathleen Estes
Romero v. USA
as 1:2010cv02374
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Romero Magana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Acosta et al v. Tourner et al
as 1:2009cv01560
Plaintiff:
Christian Acosta, Phillip Escobar, Juan Romero and others
Defendant:
James Tourner, D. Medina, E. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Acosta et al v. Tourner et al
as 1:2009at00704
Plaintiff:
Christian Acosta, Phillip Escobar, Juan Romero and others
Defendant:
James Tourner, D. Medina, E. Ovalle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Juan Romero et al v. CitiMortgage Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01793
Plaintiff:
Juan Romero and Elva Romero
Defendant:
Citimortgage Inc., Citimortgage Inc., CitiCorp Trust Bank, FSB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Romero v. USA
as 1:2008cv01393
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Romero Magana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Juan Robles v. Lydia Hensen
as 08-56388
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN ROMERO ROBLES
Respondent - Appellee:
LYDIA C. HENSEN
Juan Romero Robles v. Lydia C Hensen
as 2:2007cv04983
Petitioner:
Juan Romero Robles
Respondent:
Lydia C Hensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
