Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lewis et al v. Kelly et al
as 5:2017cv00505
Plaintiff:
Juanita Lewis and Melvin Lewis
Defendant:
Niel Kelly , Carey L. Baker , Michael Prestridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juanita Lewis, et al v. City of Clermont, Florida, Inc, et al
as 17-14002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUANITA LEWIS and MELVIN LEWIS, Sui Juirs, in propria persona
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CLERMONT, FLORIDA, INC., CLERMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES BROADWAY, Officer and others
Lewis et al v. City of Clermont, Florida, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
Juanita Lewis and Melvin Lewis
Defendant:
City of Clermont, Florida, Inc. , Clermont Police Department , Charles Broadway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Parmley
as 16-3603
Plaintiff:
Sheila Ninham Fish Coleman, Joseph Coleman as Administrator of Estate, agent of Joseph Coleman, Gabrielle Misener, Marissa Horton, AKA Marissa Hunt and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nadine O'Field / Ganonhweih, FKA Nadine Bucktooth
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Andrew Jones, Robert E. Bucktooth, Jr., Cheryl Bucktooth and others
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
Stonehorse Goeman, Marie Peters, Wealthy Bucktooth, Individually and others
Defendant - Appellee:
James J. Parmley, George Beach, Pamela J. Morris and others
Defendant:
James W. McMahon, Superintendent of New York State Police, in his official and personal capacity, County of Onondaga, Onondaga County Sheriff's Department and others
LEWIS v. HECKLER
as 2:2011cv06492
Plaintiff:
JUANITA LEWIS
Defendant:
DAVID HECKLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2010cv04966
Plaintiff:
JUANITA LEWIS
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP, BUGSCH, CARROLL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
