Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Lynn v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lynn and Wilson Lynn Jr
Defendant:
Kaiser Foundation Hospital, JAMS Endispute, Inc., successor to Judicial Arbitration & Mediation Services, Inc., Greg Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae:
The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Family Court No.2 of Pilar, Argentina in the Matter of Marcela Patricia Ballina v. Castro
as 5:2022mc01061
In Re:
Request for Judicial Assistance from the Family Court No. 2 of Pilar, Argentina in the Matter of Marcela Patricia Ballina
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Sergio Hector Castro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Martin v 356th Judicial Court Jefferson County
as 1:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Martin
Defendant:
356th Judicial Court Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Sandoval
as 1:2022cv00720
In Re:
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance From the District Court in Sao Paulo, Brazil
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jason Robert Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In Re Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Civil, Commercial, Mining and Successions Matters No. 5 in Rio Negro, Argentina in Marta Noemi Ortiz De Zarate v. Universal Assistance S.A.
as 5:2022mc00776
In Re:
Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Civil, Commercial, Mining and Successions Matters No. 5 in Rio Negro, Argentina in Marta Noemi Ortiz De Zarate v. Universal Assistance S.A.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
North Central Baptist Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
United States of America v. Texas Department of State Health Services, Vital Statistics Division
as 1:2022mc00662
In Re:
Request for Judicial Assistance from the First Family Instance 7th Judge for Family Matters of the Judicial District of Santiago De Queretaro in Queretaro, Mexico in the matter of Roberto Baudilio Vil and Letter Rogatory
Defendant:
Texas Department of State Health Services, Vital Statistics Division
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
United States of America v. Texas Department of State Health Services, Vital Statistics Section
as 1:2022cv00555
In Re:
Request for Judicial Assistance from the First Family Instance 7th Judge for Family Matters of the Judicial District of Santiago de Queretaro in Queretaro, Mexico
Respondent:
Texas Department of State Health Services, Vital Statistics Section
Petitioner:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
United States of America v. Bozdag
as 1:2021mc00476
Respondent:
Eveay Bozdag
In Re:
Request for Judicial Assistance from the Consumer Court of Istanbul in Istanbul Turkey in the matter of Ibrahim Uysal, et al v. Yenibir Hayat Yurtdisi Saglik Ve Egitim Danismanlik LTD STI
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Hutchings v. County of Llano, Texas et al
as 1:2020cv00308
Defendant:
Llano Central Appraisal District, Llano Independent School District, Joyce Gillow and others
Plaintiff:
David Roy Hutchings
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
