Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Idlibi v. New Britain Judicial District
as 3:2022cv01374
Plaintiff:
Ammar Idlibi and Middlesex Judicial District
Defendant:
New Britain Judicial District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Finance of America Reverse LLC v. Shotkin et al
as 3:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
Finance of America Reverse LLC
Defendant:
Matthew P. Shotkin, Susan Shotkin Gascon, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Raynor v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv01103
Plaintiff:
James Raynor
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, State Agency Judicial Marshal Services, Rollin Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. States Attorney, et al
as 3:2022cv00846
Petitioner:
Tod Matthew Sparks, II
Respondent:
Office of States Attorney and Judicial District of Danbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ciriello v. Judicial Branch et al
as 3:2021cv01185
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Ciriello
Defendant:
Judicial Branch, Dept Of Education, Dept of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ciriello v. Connecticut Judicial Branch
as 3:2021cv00846
Defendant:
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Ciriello
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
