Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2020cv00211
Defendant:
North Carolina State Board of Elections, Carol Hill Williams, Michael G. Dickerson
and others
Plaintiff:
Judicial Watch, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
North Carolina A. Philip Randolph Institute, League of Women Voters of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Lamone et al
as 1:2017cv02006
Plaintiff:
Judicial Watch, Inc.
Defendant:
Linda H. Lamone , David J. McManus, Jr. , Patrick J. Hogan
and others
Cause Of Action: gg-2 Nat'l. Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA)
Louis M. Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 16-2193
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, ROSANELL EATON, JOHN DOE 1
and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES, MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS M. DUKE, JOSUE E. BERDUO, BRIAN M. MILLER
and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of North Carolina, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections
and others
Intervenor/Defendant:
CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL, JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
N.C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1468
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, LINDSEY GRAHAM, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMENTA EATON, BETHEL A. BAPTIST CHURCH, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH
and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, PAUL J. FOLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections
and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 3, NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, JOHN DOE 3
and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
