Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Julian Rochester v. C. Harcuff
as 12-7474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
C. HARCUFF, Lieutenant, SERGEANT ATTWOOD, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HAYNE and others
Julian Rochester v. Bull Street State Hospital
as 12-7476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER, a/k/a Julian Edward Rochester, on behalf of Melaney Johnston deceased victim
Defendant - Appellee:
BULL STREET STATE HOSPITAL, Its New Owners, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, TOWN OF SENECA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-6118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jonathan Edwards v. Mrs. Ogunsile
as 11-7279
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN A. EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MRS. F OGUNSILE, MR. MEDVAR, CLAYTOR, Acc Warden and others
Movant - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
In Re: Julian Rochester
as 11-1931
Petitioner:
In re: JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER, a/k/a Julian E. Rochester
:
and
Julian Rochester v. Papermate Paper Corp
as 11-7088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
PAPERMATE PAPER CORP, MARLBORO HOSPITAL, SCDC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-7038
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Julian Rochester v. David McCall
as 11-6328
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID M. MCCALL, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections
Julian Rochester v. State of South Carolina
as 10-6050
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, RICHLAND COUNTY JUDICIAL CENTER, JEAN H. TOAL and others
Julian Rochester v. H. Herlong
as 09-7522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
H. M. HERLONG, R. S. CARR, H. F. FLOYD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
