Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Diaz Suarez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-69
Petitioner:
IRIS JULISSA DIAZ SUAREZ, KARLA PATRICIA SORTO DIAZ and DANIELA JULISA RAMIREZ DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARTINEZ v. ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
JULISA MARTINEZ
Defendant:
ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Molina v. Financial Recovery Services of Minnesota, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01916
Plaintiff:
Julisa Molina
Defendant:
Financial Recovery Services of Minnesota, Inc. doing business as Financial Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scheingoltz et al v. Cohen
as 1:2021cv23003
Plaintiff:
Eric Scheingoltz and Julisa Banbanaste
Defendant:
Steven Balson Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Julia Ascher v. Allstate Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv00979
Defendant:
Charlie Alexander, DOES 1-10, Allstate Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Julisa Ascher and Julia Ascher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
