Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Richardson et al. v. Jawahar et al.
as 1:2025cv01135
Defendant:
Beauty Generations Fund I, LP, Siddharth Jawahar, Fabian Urquijo and others
Plaintiff:
Kathryn A. Richardson, Elie Merheb, YTH 003, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Richardson et al. v. Jawahar et al.
as 1:2024cv00980
Defendant:
Zohar Ziv, Siddharth Jawahar, Fabian Urquijo and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Tully, Ross Travis, YTH 003, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Hallmark Licensing, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Hallmark Licensing, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Shanghai Xietong (group) Co., Ltd., BEFUNNY Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Cates v. Shlemovitz et al
as 3:2021cv00805
Plaintiff:
Cameron Cates
Defendant:
Jared Shlemovitz doing business as Junto Sounds, Proctor & Gamble Corporation doing business as Febreze, Grey Advertising Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Sanchez et al v. Arriba Juntos
as 3:2016cv00750
Plaintiff:
Angelina Sanchez , United States and City and County of San Francisco
Defendant:
Arriba Juntos
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Rojas et al v. Juntos Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01250
Plaintiff:
Adrian Rojas and Emigdio Cruz Marcial
Defendant:
Juntos Inc. , Mohamed Tariq Hag and Ernani Assuncao
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adrian Parker v. NutriSystems Inc
as 09-3545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN E. PARKER, Individually and on behalf of all others simialrly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
NUTRISYSTEMS INC
Not Party - Amicus Curiae:
SECRETARY LABOR, NATIONAL EMPLOYEES LAWYERS ASSOC, COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
