Cases 1 - 4 of 4
David Pickup, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 12-17744
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID H. PICKUP, CHRISTOPHER H. ROSICK, JOSEPH NICOLOSI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, in his official capacity, ANNA M. CABALLERO, Secretary of the California State and Consumer Services Agency, in her official capacity, SHARON LEVINE, President of the Medical Board of California, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
EQUALITY CALIFORNIA
David Pickup, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 12-17681
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID H. PICKUP, CHRISTOPHER H. ROSICK, JOSEPH NICOLOSI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, in his official capacity, ANNA M. CABALLERO, Secretary of the California State and Consumer Services Agency, in her official capacity, SHARON LEVINE, President of the Medical Board of California, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
EQUALITY CALIFORNIA
Pickup, et. al. v. Brown, et. al.
as 2:2012cv02497
Plaintiff:
David H. Pickup , Christopher H. Rosick , Joseph Nicolosi and others
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown , Anna M. Caballero , Kim Madsen and others
Intervenor:
Equality California
Movant:
Donald Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe 1 et al v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al
as 3:2007cv01499
Plaintiff:
Jack Doe 1, Jack Doe 2, Jack Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
