Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Kokinda v. Koch Industries Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01531
Plaintiff:
Jason Kokinda
Defendant:
Koch Industries Inc., Tom Wolf, William R. Stoycos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Augustus Evans, Jr. v. T. Graves, et al
as 17-2370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUGUSTUS HEBREW EVANS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE T. HENLEY GRAVES, CHIEF JUSTICE LEO E. STRINE, JR., JUSTICE RANDY HOLLAND and others
Kostyshyn v. McCormick et al
as 1:2017cv00774
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn and P.R. Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Rebecca McCormick, Maria Lyons, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Schneiderman et al
as 1:2017cv00736
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Brown
Defendant:
Eric Schneiderman, John G. Roberts, Jr., State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Minner et al
as 1:2017cv03567
Defendant:
John Carney, Delaware Governor's Office, Jack Markell and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Floyd et al v. Markell et al
as 1:2017cv00431
Plaintiff:
Saundra M. Floyd , Candyss C. White , Steven R. Floyd, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Jack Markell , Ruth Ann Minner , Stanley W. Taylor, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noble v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2017cv00353
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Noble
Defendant:
State Of Delaware, Jack Markell, Matt Denn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noble v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2017mc00062
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Noble
Defendant:
State Of Delaware, Jack Markell, Matt Denn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. MARKELL
as 1:2017cv00326
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW N.P. JONES
Defendant:
JACK MARKELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans, Jr. v. Graves et al
as 1:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Henly T. Graves, Leo Strine, Randy Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
