Cases 11 - 20 of 226
Klinke v. Palmer et al
as 3:2013cv00356
Defendant:
Associate Warden, Chapel Director, Correctional Officers of Gatehouse and others
Plaintiff:
Dirk Klinke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pope v. Palmer et al
as 3:2013cv00357
Defendant:
Associate Warden, Chapel Director, Correctional Officers of Gatehouse and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Csech v. Hannah et al
as 3:2013cv00292
Defendant:
M. Cruse, Mr. Hannah, E.K. McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Csech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fernandez v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv00276
Defendant:
R. Baker, Boynton, Mike Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tragale v. Cox et al
as 3:2013cv00233
Defendant:
Robert B. Bannister, James G. Cox, Jack Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Tragale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kapetan v. Cox
as 3:2013cv00171
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, James G. Cox, Jennifer Dutton and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kapetan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haase v. Lessard et al
as 3:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Robert Haase
Defendant:
Paul Lessard, Jack Palmer and Lisa Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quintero et al v. Palmer et al
as 3:2013cv00008
Defendant:
Associate Warden, Chapel Director, Correctional Officers of Gatehouse and others
Plaintiff:
Dirk Klinke, Kevin Pope and John Quintero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westman v. Palmer et al
as 3:2012cv00675
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer
Petitioner:
John Westman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean v. Palmer
as 3:2012cv00658
Plaintiff:
Travis Remaul Dean
Defendant:
Jack Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
