Cases 31 - 40 of 391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00488
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Redenius v. Palmer et al
as 3:2014cv00538
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer
Petitioner:
Dustin O. Redenius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Chernetsky v. State of Nevada, et al
as 14-17015
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTHONY THOMAS CHERNETSKY
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF NEVADA, GLENN WHORTON, JACK PALMER and others
Lamarr Rowell v. Jack Palmer, et al
as 14-16935
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAMARR ROWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
JACK PALMER and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Eugene Mauwee v. USDC-NVR
as 14-72809
:
In re: EUGENE A. MAUWEE
Petitioner:
EUGENE A. MAUWEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Real Party In Interest:
JACK PALMER, ROBERT LEGRAND, Warden, BALL, Amended Complaint #28 and others
Max Reed, II v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 14-16663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAX REED, II
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTHERN NEVADA CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ELY STATE PRISON and others
Palmer et al v. City of Missoula, Montana et al
as 9:2014cv00203
Plaintiff:
Jack Palmer and Carwerks
Defendant:
City of Missoula, Montana and Missoula County, Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chioke Gadsden, et al v. Tara Carpenter, et al
as 14-16250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHIOKE GADSDEN and NATHAN PETERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TARA CARPENTER, STEPHEN CLARK, JAMES GREG COX and others
Reed v. Nevada Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00313
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Brashford, Byrnes and others
Plaintiff:
Max Reed, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Spisak v. State of Nevada, et al
as 14-15991
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN SPISAK
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, JACK PALMER, ISIDRO BACA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
