Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 443
Pittman v. Cardenas, et al
as 23-1232
Plaintiff / Appellant: EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant / Appellee: CARDENAS, BRYANT and ROLAND JACKSON
Clay v. L. Lores, et al
as 1:2023cv01611
Plaintiff: Carleous Clay
Defendant: Central Office, L. Lores, Mrs. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cole We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00463
Petitioner: Joseph Macastle Jackson
Respondent: D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pettigrew v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv01294
Plaintiff: William S. Pettigrew
Defendant: Long, Dorcey and Roland Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaquez v. Schrum et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00165
Plaintiff: Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant: Chris Schrum, Johnny Dallis, Sylvia Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rankins
as 5:2023cv00439
Petitioner: David L Jackson
Respondent: William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Gregory
as 1:2023cv01245
Plaintiff: Lamar Delray Davis
Defendant: Jordan Jackson Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Reynolds, et al
as 23-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant: JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee: TERESA REYNOLDS, NATALIYA NICKELS, POWELL and others
Clay v. Lares, et al
as 23-1151
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARLEOUS DARRELL CLAY
Defendant / Appellee: DR. L. LARES, DR. RUDOLPH, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Daniels v. USAO UT Dist, et al
as 23-4049
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANNY LYNN DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee: USAO UT DIST, ANGELA MARIE REDDISH-DAY, UNITED STATES PROBATION FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?