Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Hogan v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company
as 1:2014cv00340
Defendant:
Jackson National Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Annemarie Hogan
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 181
Jackson et al v. Embrace Home Loans
as 1:2013cv00739
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jackson , Jayson Duff and LaSheld Crowder
Defendant:
Embrace Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Malley v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
as 1:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Malley
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Robert Perciasepe and Lisa P. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
v. In Re: Order of Return Marquis Jackson
as 1:2013mc00041
Defendant:
In Re: Order of Return Marquis Jackson
Tamar Garland-Jackson et al v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2012cv03720
Plaintiff:
Tamar Garland-Jackson
Defendant:
Davol Inc, C R Bard Inc and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
City of Providence et al v. Providence Teachers Union, AFT Local 958, AFL-CIO et al
as 1:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
City of Providence , Angel Taveras , Providence School Board and others
Defendant:
Providence Teachers Union, AFT Local 958, AFL-CIO , Steven F. Smith , Rhode Island Board of Regents for Elementary and Secondary Education and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00486
Plaintiff:
Erika Jackson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jackson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03405
Plaintiff:
Teresa D. Jackson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Reed v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2010cv03070
Plaintiff:
Rainie Jackson Reed
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03125
Plaintiff:
Richard Jackson, Richard Jackson and Richard Jackson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
