Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Scoma Chiropractic, P.A. v. Jackson Hewitt Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Scoma Chiropractic, P.A.
Defendant:
Jackson Hewitt Inc. , Jackson Hewitt Technology Services LLC , Astro Tax Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Hollingsworth v. Jackson Hewitt Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv50059
Plaintiff:
Phil Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Jackson Hewitt Inc., American Express Company and Restaurant.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson Hewitt Inc v. Amanda Mefferd et al
as 2:2015cv03339
Plaintiff:
Jackson Hewitt Inc
Defendant:
Amanda Mefferd and Lennie L Mefferd
Jackson Hewitt Inc v. Amanda Mefferd et al
as 2:2015mc00057
Plaintiff:
Jackson Hewitt Inc
Defendant:
Amanda Mefferd and Lennie L Mefferd
Jackson Hewitt Inc v. Barnes Enterprises et al
as 1:2011mc00090
Plaintiff:
Jackson Hewitt Inc
Defendant:
Barnes Enterprises, US Services Inc and Roger M Young
Jackson Hewitt, Inc. v. Mallard, Inc. et al
as 3:2011mc00032
Plaintiff:
Jackson Hewitt, Inc.
Defendant:
Mallard, Inc. and Jim Griffin
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. JOINER'S TAX GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00664
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
JOINER'S TAX GROUP, INC. and EARNEST JOINER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jackson Hewitt Inc. v. H&R Block Tax Services L.L.C.
as 1:2011cv00641
Plaintiff:
Jackson Hewitt Inc.
Defendant:
H&R Block Tax Services L.L.C. , H&R Block and HRB Tax Group, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
HRB Tax Group, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Jackson Hewitt Inc. and Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. CLARK
as 2:2011cv00342
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
RONALD N. CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
JACKSON HEWITT INC. v. US SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00340
Plaintiff:
JACKSON HEWITT INC.
Defendant:
US SERVICES, INC. and ROGER M. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
