Cases 21 - 30 of 69
PIPORE v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
MWAMARATUNGA PIPORE
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, DELISHA BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. Shepard et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
John Christopher Wilkerson
Defendant:
Ronald Shepard, Jermaine White, Counselor Veronica Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. BEASLEY
as 7:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HUNTER
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. MORRISON et al
as 7:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
ADRIEL NOEL MANN, SR
Defendant:
TANGIE MORRISON, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, OFFICER GILLUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS ALONZO SIMS
Defendant:
WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY, LT KERN and SGT CARGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEE GARY
Defendant:
WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY, OFFICER WILLIAMS, LT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NGUYEN v. GRAHAM et al
as 5:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
AN NGUYEN
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, VALDOSTA DISCIPLINARY PROSECUTOR, TANGIE MORRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLENDON v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EARL MCCLENDON
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, HEATHER DAVIS, LT KATRINA DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANDERS v. FORD et al
as 5:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
JOHN NICHOLAS SANDERS
Defendant:
BENJAMIN FORD, WARDEN AIMEE SMITH, LIEUTENANT FUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darryl Thomas, Jr. v. Karen Thomas, et al
as 22-12500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL DANA THOMAS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN THOMAS and JACOB BEASLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
