Cases
Peyton v. Clarke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv00709
Plaintiff: Jacob Douglas Peyton
Defendant: Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson, Warden Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Peyton, IV v. John Walrach
as 17-7434
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACOB DOUGLAS PEYTON, IV
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN WALRACH, Warden, HENRY PONTON, Regional Director, B. L. KANODE, Assistant Warden and others
Jacob Peyton v. John Comb
as 15-6129
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACOB DOUGLAS PEYTON, IV
Defendant - Appellee: MAJOR JOHN C. COMBS, Head of Security at WRSP, SERGEANT NATHAN D. JACKSON and MICHAEL A. STEELE, K9 Officer
Defendant: HAROLD W. CLARK, Director Dept. of Corr., RANDALL MATHENA, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison, MR. JEFF KISER, Asst. Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
In re: Jacob Peyton, IV
as 14-360
Movant: In re: JACOB DOUGLAS PEYTON, IV
:
Jacob Peyton v. Harold Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-6087
Petitioner - Appellant: JACOB DOUGLAS PEYTON, IV
Respondent - Appellee: HAROLD CLARKE, Director
Jacob Peyton, IV v. Harold Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-7658
Petitioner - Appellant: JACOB DOUGLAS PEYTON, IV
Respondent - Appellee: HAROLD CLARK, Director
Peyton v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv00574
Respondent: Harold Clark
Petitioner: Jacob Douglas Peyton, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peyton v. Clark
as 2:2012cv00610
Petitioner: Jacob Douglas Peyton, IV
Respondent: Harold Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peyton v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2011cv00566
Respondent: Harold Clark
Petitioner: Jacob Douglas Peyton, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?