Cases 1 - 10 of 2,999
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silsattanak v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Erik Silsattanak
Defendant:
The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, James Dzurenda, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funtila v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Michael Funtila
Defendant:
Alicia Casey and James Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Moore v. Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00774
Petitioner:
James Lamont Moore
Respondent:
Warden Oliver and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coleman v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00764
Petitioner:
Kyrel L. Coleman
Respondent:
James Dzurenda and Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luddy v. Dzurenda
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Alfred D. Luddy
Defendant:
James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Judge Steve L. Dobrescu
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Laneil James
Defendant:
Judge Steve L. Dobrescu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Venter et al v. Nye County
as 2:2024cv00723
Plaintiff:
Willem Christoffel Jacobus Venter and Robert James Hutchison
Defendant:
Nye County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wilson
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Christopher P. Dericco, Jeremy Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
