Cases 1 - 10 of 34
ROBINSON v. BROTHERS et al
as 2:2023cv02021
Petitioner:
GARY JAMES ROBINSON
Respondent:
MARK BROTHERS, THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PARDONS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Robinson v. Northumberland County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv01905
Plaintiff:
Michael James Robinson
Defendant:
Northumberland County Jail, Lt. Joe Shurock and Sgt. Bart Shuman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBINSON
Defendant:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Hein v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00287
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc., Beth Hecht, Greg Robitaille and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hein
Wheeler v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc., et al.
as 1:2021cv00213
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc., Beth Hecht, Greg Robitaille and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Bushansky v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc., et al.
as 1:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc., Beth Hecht, Greg Robitaille and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Dupree v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc., Beth Hecht, Greg Robitaille and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dupree
Wang v. Neos Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Neos Therapeutics, Inc., Beth Hecht, Greg Robitaille and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
ROBINSON v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2019cv00878
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
