Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cox v. USA
as 6:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
James E. Cox
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. James Cox
as 21-5868
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES E. COX
Cox v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
James E Cox
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Jones et al
as 1:2012cv01187
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cox
Defendant:
Jones, Cherry Lindamood, Tammy Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03125
Plaintiff:
James A. Cox
Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Services, Inc. and Abdikarin S. Omar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adkins et al v. Glaxosmithkline, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02127
Plaintiff:
Terry Adeyemi, Sarah F. Adkins, Barbara J. Ahmad and others
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline, LLC, Glaxosmithkline, LLC, Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare LLC and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
John King, et al v. Hospital Corporation of Americ, et al
as 09-5377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN A. KING, D.O. and JOHN A. KING, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, FRANK L. MOLINARO, CEO of Putnam General Hospital, TEYAS VALLEY HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. and others
King et al v. Hospital Corporation of America et al
as 2:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
John A. King and John A. King, LLC
Defendant:
Hospital Corporation of America, Frank L. Molinaro, Teays Valley Healthcare Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King v. Teays Valley Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01064
Plaintiff:
John A. King
Defendant:
Teays Valley Health Services, Inc., Hospital Corporation of America, Inc., James B. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
