Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Henson v. BP Expl & Prod
as 23-30211
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Albert Henson, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
Gibbs et al v. Carney et al
as 1:2020cv01301
Plaintiff:
Joseph Parker, Justin Erskine, William Brocklehurst and others
Defendant:
John Carney, Department of Correction, Commissioner Claire DeMatteis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02450
Defendant:
Holly Hoover and Corizon Health, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Henson Jr. v. Dolly et al
as 1:2020cv01238
Defendant:
J. Adams, K. A. Durst, C. Haer and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Henson Jr. v. Dolly et al
as 1:2020cv01237
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson Jr.
Defendant:
H. Eagleson, J. Strope, C. Dolly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Henson Jr. v. MD DPSCS et al
as 1:2020cv01073
Defendant:
Wardens, MD Div of Corr Directors, Captains and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Henson v. Bishop et al
as 1:2019cv03379
Petitioner:
James A. Henson, Jr.
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Maryland and Frank B. Bishop, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henson, Jr. v. Maryland Division of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01932
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson, Jr.
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Corrections and Frank B. Bishop, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Henson v. May et al
as 1:2019cv00240
Respondent:
Warden Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Petitioner:
James Hugh Henson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henson v. Bishop et al
as 1:2019cv00172
Defendant:
Ronald R. Stotler, Lauren Bietzel, Jeff Nines and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
