Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Moore v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
James Oliver Moore
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-6196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tetra Financial Group v. Worldwide Printing and Distribution et al
as 2:2011cv00778
Plaintiff:
Tetra Financial Group
Defendant:
Worldwide Printing and Distribution and James R. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. County of Jefferson et al
as 1:2010cv01011
Plaintiff:
James R. Moore
Defendant:
County of Jefferson , Faye (I) Griffin , Faye Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Miller et al
as 1:2010cv00651
Plaintiff:
James D. Moore
Defendant:
Shawn (I) Miller, Shawn Miller, John (I) Robledo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mowen et al
as 2:2009cv00786
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jeffrey L. Mowen, Thomas R. Fry, Bevan J. Wilde and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Moore v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2009cv02365
Plaintiff:
James E. Moore
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore et al v. Broadsire
as 1:2008cv00329
Plaintiff:
James B. Moore and Stagecoach Refinishing
Defendant:
Broadsire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Brown, et al v. Alma, Inc., et al
as 08-3013
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG W. BROWN, JAN C. BROWN, DAVID A. ARRIGHI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA, INC., a Kansas Corporation, THOMAS C. MOORE, JAMES W. MOORE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
