Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Adams v. Saul
as 23-1066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Theodore James Adams, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Comissioner of Social Security
Adams Jr et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv16319
Plaintiff:
James Adams Jr and Sheila Adams
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00818
Plaintiff:
Theodore James Adams, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Lee et al
as 3:2018cv01246
Defendant:
Chad Lee and Micheal Enfinger
Plaintiff:
Robert James Adams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Blue v. William James Adams et al
as 2:2011cv09202
Defendant:
William James Adams, Jr, Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Blue
Adams v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 3:2011cv00944
Petitioner:
Donald James Adams, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Batts et al v. Adams et al
as 1:2010cv00539
Plaintiff:
Ebony Latrice Batts, Ebony Latrice Batts, Manfred Mohr and others
Defendant:
William James Adams, Jr., Stacey Ann Ferguson, Allan Pineda Lindo and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Grounded Music Inc. v. Stacy Ann Ferguson et al
as 2:2009cv06776
Plaintiff:
Grounded Music Inc.
Defendant:
Stacy Ferguson, William James Adams, Jr., EMI April Music Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Gabriel et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03893
Plaintiff:
Keith Gabriel, Keith Gabriel, Patricia Dilosa and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
