Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
USA v. James Shook
as 21-11973
Defendant / Appellant: JAMES ALLEN SHOOK
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: James Green, II
as 20-10996
Petitioner: In re: JAMES ALLEN GREEN, II
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
USA v. James Smith
as 20-10995
Defendant / Appellant: JAMES ALLEN SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lisa Antoine v. Eugene Verin, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-10645
Plaintiff - Appellant: LISA HOPE ANTOINE
Defendant - Appellee: EUGENE R. VERIN, TERRI WILLINGHAM THOMAS, WILLIAM COOPER THOMPSON and others
Steven Hayden v. Robert Vance, Jr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-15326
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN MARK HAYDEN, individually and as trustee for William B. Cashion Nevada Spendthrift Trust and William B. Cashion Family Trust
Defendant - Appellee: ROBERT S. VANCE, JR., ANNE-MARIE ADAMS, in her individual capacity, J. SCOTT VOWELL, in his individual capacity and others
In re: James Reynolds
as 16-14322
Petitioner: In re: JAMES ALLEN REYNOLDS
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James Forester v. Dixon, et al
as 16-10636
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ALLEN FORESTER
Defendant - Appellee: DIXON, A Shift Rover for Seg. Unit, GUTHERY, A Shift Rover for Seg. Unit and BRUCE T. HODGE
In re: James Wesley
as 16-10463
Petitioner: In re: JAMES ALLEN WESLEY
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: James Wesley
as 15-15519
Petitioner: In re: JAMES ALLEN WESLEY
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
USA v. James McGee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-11716
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES A. MCGEE, a.k.a. James Allen McGee

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?