Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McCoy v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00601
Plaintiff:
James Bell McCoy Sr
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James McCoy, Sr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-11021
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BELL MCCOY, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
James McCoy, Sr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-10995
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BELL MCCOY, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
James McCoy, Sr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-10469
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BELL MCCOY, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
James McCoy, Sr. v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 13-10360
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BELL MCCOY, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
McCoy v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00878
Petitioner:
James Bell McCoy, Sr.
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James McCoy, Sr. v. Pam Pace, et al
as 12-40104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BELL MCCOY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PAM PACE, Practice Manager, LANETTE LINTHICUM, Doctor, Director TDCJ Medical Services and OWEN MURRAY, University of Texas Medical Branch Policy Director
James McCoy, Sr. v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-11000
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES BELL MCCOY, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
