Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Thomas v. Groom et al
as 5:2020cv00211
Plaintiff:
James Lee Thomas
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, James Burkes and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dearing v. Wilkinson County Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2020cv00157
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dearing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Dr. James Burke, Wilkinson County Correctional Facility, Boswell Pharmacy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Burke
as 5:2018cv00113
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
J. Burke and James Burke
Plaintiff:
Lonnie L. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv00094
Defendant:
Officer Laura Jackson, Latonya Fleming, Management & Training Corporation and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Janicholas Vankeith Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Streeval v. Green et al
as 5:2018cv00093
Defendant:
Capt. Unknown Green, Unknown Scott, Investigator Unknown Turner and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ryan Streeval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Bradley et al
as 5:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Haynes
Defendant:
Jodi Bradley, Gabriel Walker, Toomey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig v. Bradley et al
as 5:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Henry Lee Craig
Defendant:
J. Bradley, G. Walker, Unknown Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peairs v. Wiley et al
as 5:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
Nathan Peairs, Jr.
Defendant:
Patsey Wiley, James Burke and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Burke et al
as 5:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
Tyrone James Walker
Defendant:
James Burke, James Walker, B. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Woodall et al
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff:
James Irvin Hill
Defendant:
Ronald E. Woodall, Charlene McCleave, James Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
