Cases 21 - 30 of 571
Shabazz v. Beard, et al.
as 2:2014cv02432
Plaintiff:
Amir Shabazz
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Paul D. Brazelton, Edmund G. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Eleri v. James Hartley
as 14-56488
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES CHUKWUMEZE ELERI, AKA Charles C. Eleri
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden
Morrow v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2014at00672
Plaintiff:
Michael Morrow
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Matthew Cate, Susan L. Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrow v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2014cv01395
Plaintiff:
Michael Morrow
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Matthew Cate, Susan L. Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Geoffrey Boldt v. James D. Hartley
as 2:2014cv04297
Petitioner:
Geoffrey Boldt
Respondent:
James D. Hartley
Abukar et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 1:2014cv00816
Plaintiff:
Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abukar et al v. Schwarzenegger, et al
as 2:2014cv01137
Plaintiff:
Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abukar et al v. McQuarn et al
as 2:2014at00586
Plaintiff:
Abdulle Abukar , Ruben Arechiga , John Wesley Bess and others
Defendant:
Charles McQuarn, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Henry v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. et al
as 2:2014cv02823
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, P.D. Brazelton, Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry
Robert Blakewood v. James Hartley
as 14-15632
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT REEVES BLAKEWOOD
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
