Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Taylor v. Davis et al
as 9:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Quendell Taylor
Defendant:
James Davis, Christopher Farrell, J. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. Corr Health et al
as 1:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Rafer E. Bowman
Defendant:
Corr Health, Angellica Gay, Manard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Corr Health et al Case electronically transferred to United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division.
as 3:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Rafer E. Bowman
Defendant:
Corr Health, Angellica Gay, Manard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinshaw v. Frederick et al
as 6:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Defendant:
John Frederick, Mohammed Abubakari, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinshaw v. Frederick et al
as 9:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Hinshaw
Defendant:
John Frederick, Mohammed Abubakari, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grizzle v. Byerly et al
as 9:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Michael Byerly, Sean Bridges, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2017cv01290
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
James Davis Morrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2017cv00246
Petitioner:
James Davis Morrison
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Ortiz et al
as 5:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Respondent:
UP Ortiz, UP Reimer, Sharla Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McClure et al
as 5:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Respondent:
FNU McClure, FNU Shotwell and Norma Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
