Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ates et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00392
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James L Ates, Ronald Abrantes, Kendra Tennille Abron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ramos v. Dean et al
as 2:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Rae Ramos
Defendant:
James Dean, Richard Chvala, Naomi McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nichols v. Dean et al
as 2:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Gibreel H. Nichols
Defendant:
James Dean, Richard Chvala, Cynthia Ruth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirkman v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2020cv01648
Defendant:
Dynax Corporation, Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemours Company, The and others
Plaintiff:
James Dean Kirkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spells et al v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv03217
Defendant:
Edward Staggers, Leshawn June, Richard Cothran and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Spells and Julia Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Porter et al
as 6:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Garrin David Smith
Defendant:
D Porter, W Mann, J F Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Padula et al
as 5:2016cv03253
Plaintiff:
Ajaron Gamble
Defendant:
A J Padula, James Dean, Crystal Richburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. McCall et al
as 5:2014cv04428
Plaintiff:
Eugene D Patterson, Jr
Defendant:
Michael McCall, Robert Durant, Bruce Oberman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. McCall et al
as 6:2014cv02750
Plaintiff:
Gary Steven Scott
Defendant:
Michael McCall , James Dean , Willie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. McCall et al
as 2:2013cv02700
Plaintiff:
Robbie Collins
Defendant:
David M McCall, James Dean, AW Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
