Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Kenin Edwards v. James Shadid
as 24-1722
Petitioner: KENIN EDWARDS
Respondent: JAMES E. SHADID
McBride v. YA'cup et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff: Dytaniel McBride and Dytaniel L McBride
Defendant: John R YA'cup, Brian L Berntson, Bradley Dixon and others
Interested Party: USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Powers v. James Shadid, et al
as 23-1741
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS POWERS
Defendant / Appellee: JAMES E. SHADID, SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, DIANE S. SYKES and others
Clinton Barlow, III v. Freda L. Wolfson, et al
as 23-1190
Petitioner: CLINTON C. BARLOW, III
Respondent: FREDA L. WOLFSON, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, JAMES E. SHADID and JONATHAN E. HAWLEY
Moore v. Shadid
as 1:2022cv01170
Plaintiff: Jarmarco Moore
Defendant: James E Shadid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Gay v. James Shadid
as 22-1648
Petitioner: ANTHONY GAY
Respondent: JAMES E. SHADID
Mike Boatman v. James E. Shadid
as 22-1181
Petitioner: MICHAEL BOATMAN
Respondent: JAMES E. SHADID
Interested Party: HOUZZ INC.
Franshon Stapleton v. James E. Shadid
as 21-1350
Petitioner: FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N. also known as CHRIS
Respondent: JAMES E. SHADID
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Franshon Stapleton v. James E. Shadid
as 21-1032
Petitioner: FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N. also known as CHRIS
Respondent: JAMES E. SHADID
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kenneth LewisIn re: Kenneth Lewis We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-3450
Respondent: ANN WILLIAMS, ELLEN E. BOSHKOFF, BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Petitioner: In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?