Cases 31 - 40 of 94
Medina v. Tilton
as 1:2008cv00545
Petitioner:
Angel Tanguma Medina
Respondent:
James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bowman v. Tilton et al
as 2:2008cv00812
Plaintiff:
Gary Steven Bowman
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, Sue Orson and Ryan Youtsey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lucas v. Tilton et al
as 1:2008cv00515
Plaintiff:
Michael Lucas
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, N. Dawson, N. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marthell v. Tilton
as 2:2008cv00798
Petitioner:
Kerry Marthell
Respondent:
James E. Tilton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Heatley v. Tilton et al
as 2:2008cv00755
Petitioner:
Robert Sylvester Heatley
Respondent:
James E. Tilton, T Ochoa and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heatley v. Tilton et al
as 1:2008cv00580
Petitioner:
Robert Sylvester Heatley
Respondent:
James E. Tilton , T Ochoa and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tung v. Hartley et al
as 1:2008cv00457
Plaintiff:
Balwinder Singh Tung
Defendant:
James Hartley, James E. Tilton, Secretary of CDCR and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Remsen v. Attorney General of the State of California et al
as 2:2008cv00447
Petitioner:
Lawrence Remsen
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of California, James E. Tilton, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lemire et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2008at00228
Plaintiff:
Sherie Lemire, Estate, Gerard Charles St. Jovite and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwartzenegger, James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lemire et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2008cv00455
Plaintiff:
Sherie Lemire
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Arnold Schwartzenegger, James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
