Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Wilcox v. Martinez, et al
as 14-2101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PORTER WILCOX
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSANA MARTINEZ, Governor, GREGG MARCANTEL, Secretary of New Mexico Corrections Department, JERRY ROARK, Director of Adult Prisons of the Corrections Department of NM and others
Ziehl v. Frawner et al
as 2:2014cv00432
Plaintiff:
Gary Duane Ziehl
Defendant:
James Frawner, FNU Velarde and M. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Espinoza v. Frawner et al
as 2:2014cv00323
Plaintiff:
Justin Levi Espinoza
Defendant:
James Frawner and FNU Velarde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilcox v. Martinez et al
as 2:2014cv00308
Plaintiff:
John Porter Wilcox
Defendant:
Susana Martinez, Gregg Marcantel, Jerry Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Roark, et al
as 14-2001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY ROARK, JOE BOOKER, JAMES FRAWNER and others
Lopez v. Roark et al
as 2:2013cv00743
Plaintiff:
Paul Arthur Lopez
Defendant:
Jerry Roark, Joe Booker, James Frawner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Frawner et al
as 1:2013cv00694
Petitioner:
Paul Arthur Lopez
Respondent:
James Frawner and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carmichael v. Frawner et al
as 2:2010cv00642
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Carmichael
Defendant:
James Frawner , Gene Galassini and Bill Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carmichael v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 1:2010cv00369
Plaintiff:
Christopher R Carmichael
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Management and Training Corporation, Otero County Prison Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
