Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HARGRAVE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17287
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARGRAVE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARGRAVE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28548
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARGRAVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARGRAVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv09305
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARGRAVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hargrave v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03559
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
James Hargrave
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Hargrave, et al v. PennyMac Corporation
as 18-10886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HARGRAVE and SUSAN TURNER-HARGRAVE
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNYMAC CORPORATION
Hargrave et al v. PennyMac Corp.
as 3:2016cv03487
Plaintiff:
James Hargrave and Susan Turner-Hargrave
Defendant:
PennyMac Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chen et al v. Xpresspa at Term. 4 JFK, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01347
Defendant:
Xpresspa at Term. 4 JFK, LLC, Xpresspa Atlanta Terminal A, LLC, Xpressa Atlanta Terminal C, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chen, Xiao Ling Chen, Zeng Biao Teng and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hargrave v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2014cv01208
Plaintiff:
James Hargrave
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Hargrave et al
as 3:2011cv02583
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Hargrave
Garnishee:
Alpha Dental Programs Inc, ING North America Insurance Corporation, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and others
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
