Cases 51 - 60 of 104
Astorga (ID 94963) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03191
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ernest Astorga
Defendant:
James Heimgartner and (fnu) Vick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson (ID 77685) v. King et al
as 5:2015cv03183
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Jackson
Defendant:
Amanda King, Kevin Edwards and James Heimgartner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis (ID 06598) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03178
Petitioner:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pruitt v. Heimgartner, et al
as 15-3118
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD JOEL PRUITT
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility, MARY NELSON, Deputy Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility SEU and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
James (ID 77522) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03116
Petitioner:
Tyron James
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaines (ID 33515) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03053
Petitioner:
Michael L. Gaines
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Beauclair v. Roberts, et al
as 15-3046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY ELLIOTT BEAUCLAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Secretary of Corrections, in his personal and official capacity, JAMES HEIMGARTNER, FNU COCHRAN and others
Batista (ID 46123) v. Sapien et al
as 5:2015cv03039
Plaintiff:
Raul Batista
Defendant:
Robert Sapien and James Heimgartner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill (ID 100085) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2015cv03028
Petitioner:
Kwame O. Hill
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunlap (ID 108228) v. Livingood et al
as 5:2015cv03025
Plaintiff:
Marcus P. Dunlap
Defendant:
(fnu) Livingood, (fnu) McGuire, James Heimgartner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
