Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Abt v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2021cv00172
Defendant:
Cesar Conde, Michael T. Duke, James W. Breyer and others
Nominal Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Manuel Abt
Austin v. Walton et al
as 4:2014cv04153
Plaintiff:
Nathan F Austin
Defendant:
S Robson Walton , Michael T Duke , H Lee Scott, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Austin v. Walton et al
as 4:2014cv00528
Plaintiff:
Nathan F Austin
Defendant:
S Robson Walton , Michael T Duke , H Lee Scott, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: General Electric Co. Se
as 13-3763
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State Universities Retirement System of Illinois, Karen A. Christiansen, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Benson Duruaku and others
Appellant:
Clark Hampe
Defendant:
Jeffrey R. Immelt, Brackett B. Denniston, III, Pamela Daley and others
Emory v. Duke et al
as 5:2012cv05171
Plaintiff:
Larry Emory
Defendant:
Michael T Duke , Aida M Alvarez , James W Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Lerner v. Immelt
as 12-2787
Plaintiff:
Albert Stein
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Olga Lerner, Derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant General Electric Company
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeffrey R. Immelt, Brackett T. Denniston, III, Keith S. Sherin and others
Emory v. Duke et al
as 4:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Larry Emory
Defendant:
Michael T Duke , Aida M Alvarez , James W Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Brockton Contributory Retirement System et al v. General Electric Co. et al
as 1:2009cv03787
Plaintiff:
City of Brockton Contributory Retirement System, City of Brockton Contributory Retirement System, City of Brockton Contributory Retirement System and others
Defendant:
General Electric Co., Jeffrey R. Immelt, Keith Sherin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
