Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Johnson v. Odom et al
as 5:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Bennie James Johnson
Defendant:
Roy Odom, Cert Officer Todman, Cert Officer Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02375
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson v. Bobbit et al
as 6:2020cv00076
Defendant:
Deputy Warden of Care and Treatment, Officer Carter, Lt. Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Bennie James Johnson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05575
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mabry Property Management, LLC v. Johnson
as 1:2019cv01979
Defendant:
James Johnson
Plaintiff:
Mabry Property Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Western Surety Company v. Gateway One Lending & Finance LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00738
Defendant:
Toby James Johnson, Deantoni Bufford, Associated Credit Union and others
Plaintiff:
Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Gateway One Lending & Finance LLC v. Team One Motorcars LLC et al
as 1:2018cv04292
Cross Claimant:
Associated Credit Union and Deantoni Bufford
Cross Defendant:
Team One Motorcars LLC
Plaintiff:
Gateway One Lending & Finance LLC
Defendant:
Toby James Johnson and Jamal Kareem Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04121
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
JAMES JOHNSON, JAN GAMBLE and BELINDA JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Stanley
as 2:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Johnson
Defendant:
Shaun Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
