Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Johnson v. Wexford Health Services Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05712
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Jane Doe Nurse, Imotep Carter, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv06731
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
James Johnson, Crystal Walker and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. as Nominee for Quicken Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. University Of Illinois College Of Medicine At Rockford et al
as 3:2011cv50130
Defendant:
University Of Illinois College Of Medicine At Rockford - Department Of Family And Community Medicine, Winnebago County Justice Center and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Franklin et al
as 1:2010cv04988
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Johnnie L. Franklin, Landria A. Dennis, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv11508
Plaintiff:
Barry James Johnson
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. CCDOC et al
as 1:2009cv06318
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
CCDOC, Cook County Dental Dept., Cook County Medical Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv06274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chicago Joe's Tea Room, LLC et al v. The Village of Broadview, et al
as 1:2007cv02680
Plaintiff:
Chicago Joe's Tea Room, LLC and Pervis Conway
Defendant:
Village of Broadview, The, Henry Vicenik, Fitzgerald Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
