Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Thibodeaux v. Daniel et al
as 2:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Louis James Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Paul H Daniel, James Key, A Ureno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Strange et al
as 3:2023cv05072
Plaintiff:
David Michael Aaron Baker
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, James Key, Ron Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Key
as 4:2023cv05011
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Contreras
Respondent:
James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Small v. Key
as 2:2023cv00005
Petitioner:
Kelly E Small
Respondent:
James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thibodeaux v. Daniel et al
as 3:2022cv05708
Plaintiff:
Louis James Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Paul H Daniel, James Key, A Ureno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Key
as 3:2022cv05663
Petitioner:
Marcus Morrison
Respondent:
James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laferriere v. Key et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Scott Laferriere, Sophia Laferriere and Graham Sherrill
Defendant:
James Key, Riverce, Deunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherrill v. Key et al
as 2:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Graham Sherrill
Defendant:
James Key, Riverce, Deunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boot v. Key
as 2:2022cv00678
Petitioner:
Kevin L Boot
Respondent:
James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Department of Corrections of AHCC et al
as 2:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Kirk Williams
Respondent:
Department of Corrections of AHCC and Attorney James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
