Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Dickerson et al
as 4:2019cv03876
Defendant:
Lietuenant Dylan R Cooley, Tanish Sorkpor-Tran, Estelle Unit Grievance Dept. and others
Plaintiff:
James L Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Collier et al
as 4:2018cv04521
Plaintiff:
Joseph C Garcia
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, John or Jane Does 1-50, Lorie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zurovetz v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv02334
Plaintiff:
Todd Micheal Zurovetz
Defendant:
Warden James L. Jones, Lorie Davis and Karen Matlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enriquez Sanchez v. Davis et al
as 4:2016cv02356
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Enriquez Sanchez
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, James L Jones and (fnu) Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Jones et al
as 3:2010cv00321
Petitioner:
Dannie Ray Davis
Respondent:
James L. Jones, Joe E. Moya, Stephen P. Henson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns et al v. Thaler et al
as 4:2010cv02900
Plaintiff:
James Paul Burns and Damon R Capps
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, James L Jones, Corey G Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 3:2010cv00195
Plaintiff:
Dannie Ray Davis
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, James L Jones and J P Guyton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Leonard et al
as 3:2009cv00266
Plaintiff:
James L Jones
Defendant:
Gean Leonard, City Of Galveston, All "Ranking Officers" Galveston County Sherriff Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castilow v. Rivers et al
as 4:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
Edward G Castilow
Defendant:
Ronald C Rivers, James L Jones and Susan K Rivas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Moffet
as 3:2007cv00558
Plaintiff:
James L Jones
Defendant:
Sheryl Moffet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
