Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Ballard v. Broling et al
as 2:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
James Lee Ballard
Defendant:
John Lyon Broling, Brian C Rodgers and Edgar Jones, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2021cv05742
Plaintiff:
James Lee Dawson
Defendant:
State of Washington and Lisa Erwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. State of Washington
as 3:2020cv05090
Petitioner:
James Lee Dawson
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Wong et al
as 2:2019cv00990
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com Inc, Nite Ize, Inc and Nite Ize Inc
Defendant:
Zack Grey, Steve Max, Jacob Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Crooker v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv03024
Petitioner:
James Lee Crooker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chapman v. Sorenson et al
as 3:2013cv05456
Plaintiff:
Samantha A. Chapman
Defendant:
James Lee Sorenson , SDI Residual Assets LLC and Sorenson Medical Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Marlow v. State of Washington
as 2:2011cv01548
Petitioner:
James Lee Marlow, II
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. King County et al
as 2:2009cv01039
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Defendant:
King County, City of Seattle, Society Counsel Representing Accused Persons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. Nickels et al
as 2:2009cv01029
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis and Lonnie Lee McClure
Defendant:
Greg Nickels, Sandra K., City of Seattle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Washington State Penitentiary et al
as 2:2008cv05084
Plaintiff:
James Lee Baker
Defendant:
Washington State Penitentiary, Sinclair, Mark A Kucza and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
