Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bey v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv03020
Plaintiff:
Clyde Wallace Bey
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Stephanie Dorethy and James M. Carothers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Njie v. Godinez et al
as 4:2016cv04223
Plaintiff:
Adama Njie
Defendant:
Salvador A Godinez, David Gomez, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Smith v. Kevwe Akpore, et al
as 16-3608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVWE AKPORE, Warden, JAMES M. CAROTHERS, Correectional Officer, STEPHEN DAMEWOOD, Correctional Officer and others
Larry Hayes v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 14-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY C. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., SHERRY HILE, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and others
Baird v. Ford et al
as 1:2013cv01284
Plaintiff:
Willis Baird
Defendant:
Ross D Ford, Barbara A King, James M Carothers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Endicott et al
as 1:2012cv01478
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Curry
Defendant:
Mark G Endicott, David Patch, James M Carothers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larry Hayes v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 12-2799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY C. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., SHERRY HILE, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and others
Hayes v. Walker et al
as 1:2011cv01329
Plaintiff:
Larry Charbert Hayes
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Sherry Hile, Donald A Hulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Wright et al
as 1:2007cv01098
Plaintiff:
Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Jack D Durham, . Locke, . Carothers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Carothers et al
as 3:2007cv03064
Plaintiff:
Michael Tolbert
Defendant:
James M Carothers, Clifford Sangster and Stan Simonson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
