Cases 1 - 10 of 29
PRESLEY v. GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
GEORGE PRESLEY
Defendant:
GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, LLOYD J SPICKARD, STEPHANIE DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deal v. Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2021cv00181
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Brian Owens, Terry E. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Fitzgerald Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madison v. Barnard et al
as 1:2020cv03923
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Brian Owens, James W. Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Madison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 7:2019cv00088
Defendant:
JACQUELINE BUNN, TERRY E BARNARD, BRIAN OWENS and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCEY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 1:2019cv00847
Respondent:
Georgia Board of Pardons, Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, WARDEN JERMANE WHITE and others
Petitioner:
David Timothy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newton v. Owens, et al
as 3:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Terry E. Barnard, William Curry, Brian Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 5:2019cv00025
Respondent:
CHAIRMAN JAMES W MILLS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS, GEORGIA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and others
Petitioner:
DAVID TIMOTHY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WRIGHT v. OWENS et al
as 5:2018cv00427
Defendant:
SABRINA SMITH, BRIAN OWENS, BRAXTON T COTTON and others
Plaintiff:
TERRIUS WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Deal et al
as 1:2018cv05243
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Cobb County Superior Court, Christopher Michael Carr and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ludy v. Mills et al
as 4:2018cv00249
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Brian Owens, Braxton T. Cotton and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Lavern Ludy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
