Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wallace v. Hammontree et al
as 7:2014cv01756
Plaintiff:
Gilbert J Wallace
Defendant:
Lee N Hammontree, James Whitley, James Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Hood et al
as 7:2014cv00389
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Shaw
Defendant:
Hugh M Hood, Ruth Naglich, James Whitley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Kirk et al
as 7:2013cv01909
Plaintiff:
Orville Dwaine Patterson
Defendant:
S. Kirk, James Whitley, Corizon Healthcare and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sears v. Thomas et al
as 7:2011cv03176
Plaintiff:
Tim A. Sears
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Ruth Naglich, Willie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sears v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00593
Plaintiff:
Tim A. Sears
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Ruth Naglich, Willie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sears v. Whitley et al
as 7:2011cv01738
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen Sears
Defendant:
James Whitley, Dennis Butler, Georgia Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Whitley et al
as 7:2008cv02271
Plaintiff:
John Sharp
Defendant:
James Whitley, Correctional Medical Service Inc. and Richard Allen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanderson v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2008cv02243
Plaintiff:
Billy Sanderson
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Richard Allen, James Whitley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hauerwas v. Whitley et al
as 7:2008cv01001
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hauerwas
Defendant:
James Whitley, Richard Allen, Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Glenn v. Whitley et al
as 7:2007cv02199
Plaintiff:
Cecil Wayne Glenn
Defendant:
James Whitley, Miller, Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
