Cases 11 - 20 of 45
James Walker v. Patrick McTighe, et al
as 20-35077
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICK MCTIGHE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM WALKER
Williams v. Clark County et al
as 2:2019cv01212
Defendant:
(FNU) Phillips, Sgt Judd, Deputy DA Frank Logrippo and others
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. James Thurman Tanner
as 19-50116
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WILLIAM THURMAN TANNER, AKA jwatt90210@live.com, AKA jwatt92801@gmail.com, AKA savanahshusband, AKA James Tanner, AKA James William Thurman, AKA James William Thurman-Tanner
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Beneker et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00981
Plaintiff:
John Wilberding, Kody DeWeese, Tiffany Meuer-Crawford and others
Defendant:
VM Motori S.p.A., VM North America, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
James Brammer v. Raymond Madden
as 19-55113
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM BRAMMER
Williams et al v. Big Picture Loans LLC et al
as 2:2018mc00066
Defendant:
Susan McGeshick, Gertrude McGeshick, Ascension Technologies Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Renee Galloway, Dowin Coffy, Felix Gillison, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Rosette LLP
Herbert v. Perkins Coie, LLP et al
as 2:2018cv00767
Plaintiff:
Anthony George Herbert, Jr.
Defendant:
Perkins Coie, LLP, Lynda Mathews, James Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Marquis William
as 18-50121
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARQUIS JAMES WILLIAMS
In re: Liang-Houh Shieh v. State Bar of California, et al
as 16-56556
:
In re: LIANG-HOUH SHIEH, A Member of the Bar in Good Standing
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF BAR COURT OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, PAUL A. TURNER and others
Movant - Appellant:
LIANG HOUH SHIEH, Attorney, Bar No. 128034
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
