Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Williams v. Lowe et al
as 2:2013cv00491
Plaintiff:
James Williams, III
Defendant:
Lowe, Powell, Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 7:2013cv00318
Plaintiff:
James Williams and Barbara Williams
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC, Meritplan Insurance Company and Balboa Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Bailey v. Patterson et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
James William Bailey, IV
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Jackson et al
as 2:2012cv00892
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Janarius Jackson and J. C. Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State of Alabama
as 2:2012cv02750
Plaintiff:
James Williams, III
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagood v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2012cv02631
Plaintiff:
James William Hagood
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bailey v. Patterson, et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2011cv00321
Plaintiff:
James William Bailey, IV
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Hetzel et al
as 2:2010cv01835
Petitioner:
James Williams Watkins
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abrahams et al v. Phill-Con Services, LLC
as 2:2010cv00326
Plaintiff:
Ethel L. Abrahams , Frank Acoff , Ozel Benjamin and others
Defendant:
Phill-Con Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
McCuddy v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2010cv00816
Plaintiff:
James William McCuddy
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
