Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cooper v. Knapp et al
as 1:2022cv01323
Plaintiff:
Jamil Cooper
Defendant:
Unit Manager Knapp, Richard Ellers, Corrections Officer Chicolite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Knapp et al
as 1:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Jamil Cooper
Defendant:
Unit Manager Knapp, Richard Ellers, Corrections Officer Chicolite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06210
Plaintiff:
Lamar Jamil Cooper
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cooper v. Miller et al
as 1:2020cv02430
Defendant:
Major Haldman, Program Manager T. Miller, Sgt. Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamil Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Garman et al
as 1:2019cv02227
Defendant:
Corrections Officer Kauert, Mark Garman, Trisha Pilosi and others
Plaintiff:
Jamil Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Sherman et al
as 1:2017cv02064
Plaintiff:
Jamil Cooper
Defendant:
Sherman, Thompson, Mark Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamil Cooper v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 16-1958
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIL COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARIROSA LAMAS, KURT GRANLUND and others
Jamil Cooper v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 15-1017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMIL COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, MARIROSA LAMAS and others
COOPER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2013cv03154
Petitioner:
JAMIL COOPER
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv01186
Plaintiff:
Jamil Cooper
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John Wetzel, Marirosa Lamas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
