Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Haggart v. US
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HAGGART, KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
DAVID & KAREN BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01993
Plaintiff:
DAVID & KAREN BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, GAIL C. JOHANNSEN-BRIDGE REVOCABLE TRUST, JANE A. LARSON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SCHAEFER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01152
Petitioner:
JANE C. SCHAEFER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ROEDER et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01059
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. ROEDER and MARY JANE ROEDER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
PETERS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
ROSS PETERS, XAVIERA PETERS, JANE KAO and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Bradley v. US
as 23-1707
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH G. BRADLEY, DENNY W. BRANHAM, ROBERTA L. ANDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
BRULIN & COMPANY, INC., CHARLES F. BUTLER, BURNETT PARTNERSHIP LLP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
BIALIK et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
YVONNE M. BIALIK, JANE K. FINE, LORIL GARRETT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Jones-Bey v. Chen
as 22-2019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SISTER E. JONES-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
PAMELA K. CHEN, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, LETITIA JAMES and others
Kimmel v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
as 22-1754
Petitioner:
JOSHUA KIMMEL and AMANDA JANE WOLFE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
THOMPSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
KATHARINE JANE THOMPSON and KATIE JANE THOMPSON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
